The newest series of articles I plan on sporadically writing about will explore the Hall of Fame chances of forty active players. Obviously, a number of active players (to be detailed below) are already surefire Hall-of-Famers, and as such, their Hall-of-Fame chances need not and will not be reviewed. However, it is not that simple.
First of all, the primary requirement for any player discussed is that they must have been at least 30 years old at the start of the 2010 MLB season. That does not mean every 30+ player with at least a minimal chance of reaching the Hall-of-Fame will be discussed. Certain players, such as 31-year old Brandon Webb, are not included, as his situation is currently too murky to adequately project into the future. A number of players over the age of 30 have been excluded due to the fact that their careers are still very young and have not accumulated enough playing time for me to predict the possibility of them being worthy of the Hall-of-Fame. Additionally, a player must not have officially retired. Therefore, a player such as Carlos Delgado, who despite not playing thus far in 2010, but has not yet announced his retirement, is eligible.
The biggest issue regarding the forthcoming Hall-of-Fame debates is the question I am asking. That question is precisely: do I believe that when this player retires, their on-the-field career, statistics, and accomplishments will be worthy of a Hall-of-Fame induction. This is instrumental to understanding the debates. The question is NOT: will this player ACTUALLY BE inducted into the Hall-of-Fame. In order to understand the distinction between this question and the question I am asking, just consider a number of players: Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, Rafael Palmeiro, Sammy Sosa, Roger Clemens….you get the point. I’m not here to speculate on the vague issue of steroids. Additionally, a player such as Roberto Alomar is another example. I still believe Alomar had a HOF-worthy career, despite the fact that, in 2009, his first year on the ballot, he fell 8 votes short of getting elected and is still not currently a Hall-of-Famer for whatever inane reasoning. I am only analyzing what the player has accomplished on the field and the impact their play has had over the course of their careers.
Additionally, the question is NOT: is this player currently a Hall-of-Famer. For the vast majority of the players debated, the answer will obviously be no. How a player projects over the remainder of their career is instrumental in the debate as to whether or not they will be worthy of the Hall-of-Fame upon retirement. Continue reading ‘The Hall of Fame Debates’
